Child safety seats are the single most important piece of life-safety equipment a family will ever buy. They are also a regulated product subject to engineering and labeling defects that have produced significant litigation against every major child seat manufacturer. Cronauer Law represents families nationwide in defective child safety seat cases, including infant carriers, convertible (infant-toddler) seats, all-in-one seats, combination harness/booster seats, and high-back and backless belt-positioning boosters.
Child seat defect cases combine biomechanical engineering, materials science, human factors, and—critically—the regulatory record around FMVSS 213, the federal standard that governs child restraint systems. The standard has been criticized for years; many manufacturers voluntarily exceed it. The cases that reach trial are often the cases where the manufacturer did not.
No upfront costs & fees
Means you can afford a lawyer now
And our trial lawyer has a 7 year winning streak…
All have a 5-point harness. Common defect patterns include shell fractures, harness webbing failures, harness buckle defects, and base/carrier release failures.
Used rear-facing and convert to forward-facing. Common defect patterns include premature-graduation labeling and instruction defects, harness failures, and recline-angle / installation incompatibility.
Used rear-facing, forward-facing with harness, then as belt-positioning booster. Common defect patterns include harness-removal hardware defects, booster-mode geometry, and labeling complexity that fails to communicate the safety implications of each transition.
Forward-facing with 5-point harness, then booster. Defects often track those of all-in-one seats.
Use the regular vehicle lap and shoulder belt. Defect patterns include lap belt routing that allows abdominal loading, shoulder-belt routing that crosses the neck, inadequate side-impact head protection on backless designs, and labeling that fails to communicate weight, height, and age maturity considerations.
Most child seat litigation includes a marketing-defect or failure-to-warn count. The categories include inadequate weight, height, and age guidelines; labeling that promotes premature graduation to the next category of seat (rear-facing to forward-facing, forward-facing to booster); failure to warn about the safety implications of each transition; failure to incorporate AAP and NHTSA recommendations on extended rear-facing use; and incorrect, vague, or contradictory installation instructions.
Design defect categories include lack of adequate head and shoulder containment; lack of comprehensive side-impact protection; harness buckle defects (“too easy to unlatch” — children release in motion; “too difficult to unlatch” — caregivers cannot extract the child in fires or submersions); harness webbing and splitter-plate defects; and harness adjustment defects that allow the harness to loosen in service.
Manufacturing defects include sharp edges on load-bearing components, inconsistent webbing weave or strength, and quality-control escapes. Cases are often supported by recall histories.
FMVSS 213, 49 C.F.R. § 571.213, prescribes sled-test performance standards for child restraint systems. The test is a frontal-impact sled test using a child anthropomorphic test device. Side-impact testing has been added to the standard incrementally; comprehensive side-impact requirements have lagged behind industry practice. Many manufacturers voluntarily exceed FMVSS 213 with side-impact-rated designs, real-world crash testing, and proprietary anti-rebound features.
As with all FMVSS, compliance with FMVSS 213 is not a defense to a state-law product liability claim. Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., 562 U.S. 323 (2011); 49 U.S.C. § 30103(e).
LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children) is the standardized installation interface mandated by FMVSS 225. LATCH anchor pull-out under load, tether anchor failure, and vehicle/child-seat geometric incompatibility are recognized failure modes that can implicate both the vehicle manufacturer and the child seat manufacturer.
Each is rebuttable. Misinstallation defenses are routinely defeated by demonstrating that the instructions were inadequate, that the LATCH geometry was incompatible, or that the design induced foreseeable user error. Recall defenses are blunted by the manufacturer’s own recall notice—proof that the defect existed.
Pediatric crashworthiness damages are uniquely severe. They include lifelong medical care, attendant care, equipment, special education, vocational impact, and the full panoply of pain, suffering, and loss of enjoyment of life elements. In wrongful death actions, the available damages categories are governed by state law. Cronauer Law builds the damages presentation with pediatric life-care planners and economists who specialize in catastrophic pediatric injury cases.
Yes. Recalls do not preclude product liability claims. In many cases the recall itself is admissible as evidence of the manufacturer’s awareness of the defect. Whether the parent’s response (or non-response) to the recall has any effect on damages is a state-by-state question.
LATCH stands for Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children. The system is built into U.S. vehicles under FMVSS 225 and provides a standardized installation interface. LATCH anchor pull-out and tether anchor failure are recognized failure modes; cases involving LATCH failure can name both the vehicle manufacturer and the child seat manufacturer.
No. Like all FMVSS, 213 is a minimum, and compliance does not preempt or defeat a state-law product liability claim. The Safety Act’s savings clause and the Williamson preemption framework preserve common-law remedies.
Most child seats carry a useful-service-life rating, often six to ten years. Use of an expired seat may bear on damages or comparative fault under state law, but does not, by itself, bar a claim where the alleged defect existed at the time of original sale and was not addressed by the labeling.
Do not destroy or return the seat. Preserve it in its post-crash condition, with the harness, the buckle, and any installation hardware. Photograph the seat in place in the vehicle before removing it where possible. Cronauer Law issues spoliation letters to all relevant parties the same day we are retained.
Ranked top 10 in the Nation
The National Trial Lawyers recognizes Nicholas Cronauer as one of the top 10 lawyers
under the age of 40 in the nation.
With you at every step
Cronauer Law has years of experience representing clients who have been seriously injured.
We know what it takes to win, and have prepared the the steps we need to take to get the best outcome clients can expect from hiring a lawyer.
Contact us to get the process started. Our lawyers will explain the laws around your case at no cost to you.
We work with the insurance companies to ensure they fulfill their duties to cover the costs related to the crash
A Serious injury can dramatically change how you plan on reaching your life goals. We’ll work with you long after the case has won to ensure your life gets to where it needs to be
We take pride in what we do
We understand that most people may not have hired a lawyer before, so we make it as easy and clear as possible to understand what We will answer all of your questions, and guide you through this process. We are here to help you.
If you were injured in any way–medically, emotionally, physically, in a car, at work, on the street–then you may have a case. Employers, companies, and individuals have a “duty of care.” This term refers to each person’s obligation to avoid actions or situations that endanger other people.
Personal injury attorneys offer their services on what is called a “contingency fee” basis. That means we pay for all the upfront costs of your case–hiring specialists, paying court fees, even assessing medical care. You owe us nothing, and we only take a fee if you win your case.
As soon as possible, ideally. Give our personal injury law firm a call to speak with one of our staff members confidentially, even if it’s not normal business hours where you are. Also feel free to fill out our contact form with some basic information about you and your case. A member of our team will get back to you as soon as possible.
Once we’ve investigated the basic details of your injuries and your case, we’ll be able to tell you how much compensation you’re entitled to. While we (and no ethical attorney) can make promises regarding your case, we can help calculate the costs and lost wages caused by your harm.
Cronauer law injury attorneys have tried virtually every type and size of plaintiff’s claim possible. We’ve handled cases on behalf of people injured in car crashes, Engineers injured in a slip and fall, and even businessmen who have been wronged by their partners. Our firm has made a name for itself in a variety of legal areas. Our results in complex areas like commercial litigation, trucking accidents, Criminal Defense, and Product Liability barely scratch the surface. Whatever the nature of your injury, we have the experience and resources to demand compensation on your behalf.
Enter as much information as you can. Skip any questions that you do not know right away or does not apply to you.